<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screenshot conundrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinderwick.ca/notebook/2008/08/07/screenshot-conundrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinderwick.ca/notebook/2008/08/07/screenshot-conundrum/</link>
	<description>Burning fragments of life with technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:33:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: libby</title>
		<link>http://cinderwick.ca/notebook/2008/08/07/screenshot-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinderwick.ca/?p=62#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Ha! However, Thayer didn&#039;t want the photo displayed on our site for all to see and I don&#039;t blame him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! However, Thayer didn&#8217;t want the photo displayed on our site for all to see and I don&#8217;t blame him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhave</title>
		<link>http://cinderwick.ca/notebook/2008/08/07/screenshot-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>dhave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinderwick.ca/?p=62#comment-20</guid>
		<description>O.K., that makes sense. You were considerate to do as you did. I probably would have clicked on the link if I&#039;d known what &quot;NSFW&quot; means. (I had to look it up.) 

BTW, your husband was very generous to let you post his photo like this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.K., that makes sense. You were considerate to do as you did. I probably would have clicked on the link if I&#8217;d known what &#8220;NSFW&#8221; means. (I had to look it up.) </p>
<p>BTW, your husband was very generous to let you post his photo like this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libby</title>
		<link>http://cinderwick.ca/notebook/2008/08/07/screenshot-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinderwick.ca/?p=62#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t include a thumbnail as I thought for some it might not be appropriate viewing material and I didn&#039;t want to offend anyone.  In fact I thought &quot;more&quot; would click on the link just because it was tagged NSFW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t include a thumbnail as I thought for some it might not be appropriate viewing material and I didn&#8217;t want to offend anyone.  In fact I thought &#8220;more&#8221; would click on the link just because it was tagged NSFW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhave</title>
		<link>http://cinderwick.ca/notebook/2008/08/07/screenshot-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>dhave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinderwick.ca/?p=62#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Interesting experiment. I&#039;m surprised no one ever commented. I think you&#039;d have gotten more response -- or at least some -- if you&#039;d included a thumbnail in your post. When I look at the screenshots forum (I hang out on the Arch forum a good bit), I usually just scan a few pages to see what looks interesting. I don&#039;t believe I&#039;ve ever clicked on a link that doesn&#039;t have a thumbnail, but maybe some real afficionados do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting experiment. I&#8217;m surprised no one ever commented. I think you&#8217;d have gotten more response &#8212; or at least some &#8212; if you&#8217;d included a thumbnail in your post. When I look at the screenshots forum (I hang out on the Arch forum a good bit), I usually just scan a few pages to see what looks interesting. I don&#8217;t believe I&#8217;ve ever clicked on a link that doesn&#8217;t have a thumbnail, but maybe some real afficionados do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
